BMOC at EMC World May 13, 2008
Posted by ldallas in Content Management.Tags: Documentum, EMC, EMC World
add a comment
I was inspired by two recent posts. Pie’s invitation to meet him at EMC World and Chuck Hollis’ post on transparency in blogging.
I’ll be manning the Armedia booth (#336) at EMC World in Las Vegas this year and I’d love for you to stop by and visit. I’d like to tell you that I have lofty goals to investigate the inner workings of EMC and uncover some remarkable technical insight. The truth is I’ll be there for 4 days of shameless self promotion. I hope you’ll stop by and chat a while about how much we miss Workspace, swap war stories and talk about how bright our futures look with all things EMC. (and SharePoint)
Marko will be prowling the floor in his BMOC shirt. I’ll try to come up with some sort of fitting reward for anyone who hunts him down and says something witty and insulting.
At heart, I’m still a geek though and I hope to learn quite a lot this year. I am most looking forward to learning as much as I can about what they plan on doing with eRoom, what their strategy really is for SharePoint and seeing what others are doing with Documentum and RIA’s.
We’ll see you in Vegas.
The ROI on ECM - Estimating Storage May 6, 2008
Posted by msillanp in EMC.Tags: ECM, roi
add a comment
Lee and I were talking and one of the most common questions we hear from clients implementing or managing a content management system is how to calculate a return on their system. Companies end up spending hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars on a CMS system with no idea of how to track the value it is bringing to their organization.
There is no one simple formula to calculate ROI for a CMS system. Instead what we have discovered is there are a series of calculations one can make to understand the costs and saving of the system. These numbers can then be used to calculate the return on the implementation. To introduce these calculations we decided to start a series of posts, with this being the inaugural issue. Being the first one we’ll start with a simple, yet regularly asked question, how much storage do I need?
Open Text and License Revenue May 1, 2008
Posted by ldallas in Content Management, EMC.Tags: Documentum, EMC, Open Text
add a comment
I am amazed at how (at least in public) old time “Documentum” people continue to be dismissive of Open Text. I’ve written here before that it seemed that OT’s acquisition strategy and close ties to Microsoft seemed at odds with a takeover bid but In case you haven’t noticed, Open Text is making money. A lot of it. With a market cap approaching 1.9 billion and license revenue up, they are trending much better than Documentum and it is just too much cash to ignore. (more…)
OEM and the EMC Inside Strategy April 29, 2008
Posted by ldallas in Content Management.Tags: ApplicationXTender, Captiva, Documentum, EMC, OEM, X-HIVE
add a comment
After an uncomfortably long silence we are seeing more about EMC’s OEM strategy as it relates to Content Management. The press release adresses five key areas.
- A formal rebranding of the X-Hive XML server and a reference from www.doczone.com
- IRM and a customer highlight for a SaaS evidence management application
- The OEM content server is mentioned with no customer reference
- Application Xtender is presented as a peer to content server
- Captiva remains the cornerstone for capture
It is clear that Content Management and Archiving has great plans for X-Hive. CMA seems relieved to finally have a competitive strategy for the component content management space. Similarly, RSA offerings have equal prominence but the most intersting note is what was not said. Only RSA is called out as being embedded. No mention is made of how the customer handles the CMS related functions. (more…)
Be Mindful of Mashups April 25, 2008
Posted by ldallas in Content Management.Tags: ECM, Kapow Technologies, Mashups
add a comment
Generally speaking, if you can’t tell me what a buzzword means in a sentence or two, I dismiss the term as half baked and relegate it to the bingo chart. When I first heard the term Mashup in relation to software, the poor girl at the trade show was unable to pass this test so I took the chotchkies and moved on. Well that was several years ago and the products from the big players (IBM, Microsoft, etc.) are starting to accumulate. It’s time to take notice and figure out what this means to you. (more…)
TellMe the Next UI April 22, 2008
Posted by msillanp in Content Management.Tags: XML
add a comment
Imagine this scene later this year. You’re driving down the autobahn in your new 2008 BMW and want to grab dinner but you don’t know where. So you move your hand over to your iDrive controller on your BMW ConnectedDrive to select restaurants on your 2”x5” screen. As you enter text entry mode to type in the name of the restaurant, your window (lowercase “w”) erupts in blue as you drive into a bridge embankment at 150mph. It the ultimate blue screen of death. It surprises me that every device these days requires the touch input.
Venture Capital Still Believes in ECM April 11, 2008
Posted by msillanp in Content Management.add a comment
Following closely behind Alfresco’s Series C round of $9M, SpringCM received $10M in their Series B round this week. Many of us are familiar with the open source approach to content management by Alfresco, but not as many of us have heard of SpringCM. And that’s where SpringCM plans to focus their new found $14M ($4M was a credit extension) on marketing. Better still as part of the investment Jeffrey Beir joining their board of directors. His success in building eRoom will be a great help at this point of growth.
Virtualization and Software Cost April 9, 2008
Posted by ldallas in Content Management, ECM, EMC, Technology.Tags: ECM, EMC, virtualization
add a comment
Chuck Hollis scares me. If you aren’t a regular reader of his blog you’re missing out. He has a deceptively disarming way of painting the picture of technoloy’s future that makes you feel better about the coming apocalypse. Chuck just put out a series of great posts on The Changing Face of Information. He posts often on VMWare and virtualization in general and for the series he included this post where he argues that virtualization reduces friction in IT delivery. It makes me wonder, with no friction - how do you hold on to it. Or better - how do you hold on to IT. (more…)
ECM 2.0 from EMC - I’ll wait for SP2 April 8, 2008
Posted by ldallas in Content Management.Tags: Documentum, ECM, ECM 2.0, EMC
3 comments
I was reading over the Open Text announcement of their Enterprise 2.0 strategy. I am reminded of the old line. “I’ve started working on my second million. The first didn’t turn out so well.” When exactly was 1.0 finished and just what is so different that it warrants incrementing the major version?
The announcement highlights a number of key points but the central idea for us is in the middle of the list
- “Enterprise 2.0 Content Management: Provide flexible use of wikis, forums, blogs, tagging, and real-time collaboration. Provide advanced handling of rich-media content, with special emphasis on video, which is quickly becoming the de-facto format for 2.0 style work. “
I first heard EMC talking up Enterprise 2.0 at EMC World last year but I haven’t seen as succinct a summary of their strategy as we find from Open Text. When EMC talks 2.0, it’s much more about platform and frameworks than specific end user capability. All this new world dawning talk is nice but If you already have Documentum in house, is this something to consider.
Sharepoint’s Real Competition - Exchange April 4, 2008
Posted by ldallas in Content Management.Tags: Collaboration, Documentum Client for Outlook, ECM, Exchange, Outlook, Portals, SharePoint
3 comments
I am in my early forties and I am frightening close the 300 lbs - I’m not prone to giggle. When I read Shawn Shell’s post on CMSWatch about an internal debate at Microsoft about Shared Folders vs. Sharepoint I giggled like a school girl. An imagined exchange played out in my head peppered with grandiose terms like “synergy” and accusations of the one group against another not wanting to be “team players.” However entertaining the speculation may be, the future relationship between Exchange, Outlook and Sharepoint is far from certain. (more…)
